WELCOME STUDENTS!
This is a place for us to discuss openly and honestly the literature we are reading. Here we are all just communicating our thoughts on what we are reading. There are no right and wrong answers. However, you are expected to be polite, mature, and on topic.
4 comments:
The knight, in my opinion, is the most interesting pilgrim in the Canterbury Tales. The knight is the first character introduced, making him one of the highest ranked people on the pilgrimage. Geoffrey Chaucer describes the knight as having truth, honor, generosity, and courtesy. He is also very religious and has fought in many of the religious wars. Despite his level of rank, honor and wealth, the knight is one of the most modestly dressed pilgrims, only wearing a fustian tunic. His modest attire shows that he is truly a good person who does not let his fame and wealth spoil his good nature and personality. To sum up his description of the knight, Chaucer says, "He was a true, a perfect gentle-knight."
-JTN 3rd block
I find the Oxford Cleric fascinating because of the time in which he lives. Though education is unimportant to most people in the this, he sacrifices everything to learn. This is proven by his "sober stare" and "threadbare coat." Even though he knows he will never get a profitable job, he continues to learn because it is what he loves. He represents the rise in the importance of education. Though he lives in the medieval period, the Oxford Cleric is truly a "Renaissance man."
SA block 3
I find the Parson to be a fascinating character. Chaucer gives very little of his physical description except that he has a stave in his hand. Chaucer focuses less on physical appearance of good people. He lets their personality describe them. The Parson's personality is righteous and religious. A line that would sum up the Parson would be "I think there never was a better priest." In a time where there was lots of corruption in the church, it's nice to see a person who truly is religious.
I find the Miller interesting because he seems to be the only character that Chaucer has an opinion of dislike that was merely personal. Chaucer obviously has plenty of opinions about the church and about the practices of certain people, but he seems to just dislike the fact that this man is from Scotland. Certainly, it seemed odd that Chaucer just dislikes him from the get-go. Chaucer may have a reason to dislike him, but he says it in a way that implies most Scotts are like the Miller, and they too are disliked by Chaucer
Post a Comment